PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
160.92%
Net income growth similar to SAND's 152.67%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
3.19%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -7.13%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
0.25%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SAND's 156.96%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
177.90%
SBC growth while SAND is negative at -1.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-55.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -266.82%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-509.30%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SAND at -686.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SAND's 97.99%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-101.84%
Negative yoy while SAND is 27.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
30.24%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SAND's 12.36%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-1.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -552.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases well above SAND's 84.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
70800.00%
We have some liquidation growth while SAND is negative at -95.85%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
16528.30%
We have some outflow growth while SAND is negative at -246.87%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
1431.96%
We have mild expansions while SAND is negative at -1474.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
6.80%
Debt repayment well below SAND's 78.72%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.