PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.06%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -13.56%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.46%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -9.02%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-25.34%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-31.81%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 12.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-645.44%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SAND is 112.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
52.36%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. SAND's 126.10%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-335.70%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -1371.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
126.03%
Some yoy increase while SAND is negative at -36.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-7.33%
Negative yoy CFO while SAND is 9.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-100.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -62.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.70%
We reduce yoy sales while SAND is 465.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-220.41%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 155.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-143.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -3.27%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-69.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -120.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.