PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.50%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 169.01%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-9.51%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SAND at -2.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-156.85%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SAND stands at 185.36%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-90.86%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SAND at -0.07%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-219.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -209.84%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-165.43%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SAND at -253.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-468.16%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 1683.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-555.78%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -128.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-14.53%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SAND at -19.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
100.00%
Some CapEx rise while SAND is negative at -116.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.37%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SAND's 548.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
105.16%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SAND's 544.67%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
52.79%
We repay more while SAND is negative at -38.89%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.