PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
41.64%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -8.67%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.23%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -7.33%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
99.10%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SAND's 231.68%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
2335.70%
SBC growth while SAND is negative at -0.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
166.41%
Well above SAND's 109.24% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-45.12%
AR is negative yoy while SAND is 159.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
125.29%
Some yoy usage while SAND is negative at -272.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
188.61%
Well above SAND's 77.36%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
50.27%
Operating cash flow growth similar to SAND's 46.43%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40106.50%
We have some liquidation growth while SAND is negative at -39.57%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-411.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -41.08%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
72265.38%
We have mild expansions while SAND is negative at -41.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-103.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SAND is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.