PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.90%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 61.15%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.33%
Negative yoy D&A while SAND is 10.51%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-14030.23%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SAND stands at 37.65%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-87.74%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 2.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-147.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -2852.53%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
134.82%
AR growth while SAND is negative at -201.31%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.24%
Some yoy usage while SAND is negative at -119.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-202.13%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -148.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.83%
Negative yoy CFO while SAND is 9.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
64.30%
Some CapEx rise while SAND is negative at -2975.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while SAND is negative at -372.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
129.23%
We have some liquidation growth while SAND is negative at -9.86%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
69.70%
We have some outflow growth while SAND is negative at -42.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
200.22%
We have mild expansions while SAND is negative at -66.78%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-91.19%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.