PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
116.27%
Net income growth above 1.5x SAND's 11.67%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
7.88%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -3.03%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
58.43%
Well above SAND's 3.03% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
33.34%
SBC growth while SAND is negative at -5.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-161.59%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SAND is 11.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-146.54%
AR is negative yoy while SAND is 15.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-124.51%
Both negative yoy AP, with SAND at -14.83%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-182.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -9.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-8516.17%
Negative yoy while SAND is 127.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-2.98%
Negative yoy CFO while SAND is 8.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-16744.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -153.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.10%
Some yoy expansion while SAND is negative at -80.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
2516.86%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SAND's 38.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
144.26%
We have some outflow growth while SAND is negative at -103.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-4026.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -129.08%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-0.51%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
932.90%
Issuance growth of 932.90% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.