PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 23.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.38%
Negative yoy D&A while SAND is 32.56%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-2.19%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SAND stands at 9.75%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
79.42%
SBC growth well above SAND's 3.74%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-482.86%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -69.30%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1119.88%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SAND at -60.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
117.96%
Inventory growth of 117.96% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-231.38%
Both negative yoy AP, with SAND at -109.61%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
14.21%
Some yoy usage while SAND is negative at -105.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
100.39%
Some yoy increase while SAND is negative at -19.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
7.81%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SAND's 14.65%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
84.87%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 86.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-393066.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while SAND stands at 17.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while SAND is 914.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
181.48%
Growth well above SAND's 42.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
76.94%
Investing outflow well above SAND's 79.83%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-1.52%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
164.26%
Issuance growth of 164.26% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.