PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
31.79%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -20.19%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-15.06%
Negative yoy D&A while SAND is 62.82%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
5873.13%
Some yoy growth while SAND is negative at -237.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
99.48%
SBC growth well above SAND's 1.68%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-35.80%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -154.85%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-84.06%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SAND at -319.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
123.20%
Inventory growth well above SAND's 60.01%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
170.90%
A yoy AP increase while SAND is negative at -60.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
150.68%
Some yoy usage while SAND is negative at -58.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-41373.38%
Negative yoy while SAND is 54.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-25.13%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SAND at -24.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-205.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -1121.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.44%
Purchases well above SAND's 88.68%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5417.49%
We have some outflow growth while SAND is negative at -194.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-161.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -1052.58%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
0.50%
We repay more while SAND is negative at -240.86%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-96.55%
Negative yoy issuance while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.