PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 852.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.21%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SAND at -8.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
46.81%
Some yoy growth while SAND is negative at -167.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-12.71%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 18.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-138.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SAND is 21.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-57.16%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SAND at -167.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-60.23%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SAND at -85.67%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-369.57%
Negative yoy AP while SAND is 85.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-116.73%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 86.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
92.37%
Some yoy increase while SAND is negative at -10.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-21.46%
Negative yoy CFO while SAND is 52.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-136.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while SAND is 96.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while SAND is negative at -94.19%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-3857.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while SAND stands at 48.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SAND at -63.10%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-5988.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -381.73%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-146.85%
We reduce yoy invests while SAND stands at 94.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-2.54%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SAND is 81.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
233.43%
We slightly raise equity while SAND is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while SAND is negative at -179.28%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.