PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SAND at -116.77%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-9.99%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SAND at -14.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
97.55%
Well above SAND's 9.78% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-80.37%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 6.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-24.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -108.70%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
1201.96%
AR growth while SAND is negative at -148.29%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-284.77%
Negative yoy AP while SAND is 34.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-84.71%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
8917.28%
Well above SAND's 305.68%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-11.81%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SAND at -23.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.80%
Some CapEx rise while SAND is negative at -10.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while SAND is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
82.91%
Purchases well above SAND's 61.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while SAND is 340.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-30.43%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 462100100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
2.50%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SAND's 128.41%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-3.50%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SAND is 7.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
103.42%
Issuance growth of 103.42% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -142.11%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.