95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-25.10%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 351.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SAND at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
59100.18%
Well above SAND's 15.80% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
387.20%
SBC growth well above SAND's 0.05%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-270.79%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SAND is 998.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-189.88%
AR is negative yoy while SAND is 280.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
151.69%
A yoy AP increase while SAND is negative at -65.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-385.98%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-49.48%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -71.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
6.73%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SAND's 24.31%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
90.09%
Some CapEx rise while SAND is negative at -50.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases well above SAND's 76.83%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.54%
We have some outflow growth while SAND is negative at -98.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
128.50%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SAND's 717.47%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
0.68%
We repay more while SAND is negative at -35.35%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
118.88%
Issuance growth of 118.88% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.