95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
88831098.78%
Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
88831098.78%
Positive gross profit growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
392.41%
Positive EBIT growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
392.41%
Positive operating income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-377.97%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-350.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-350.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
285.84%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
285.84%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
355.10%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
355.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
355.10%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 46.28%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.75%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while AEM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-3.75%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-3.75%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AEM is at 7.90%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-137.72%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.