PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.63%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AEM's 4.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
34.63%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AEM's 22.87%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
315.91%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AEM's 119.82%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
315.91%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AEM's 119.82%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
460.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x AEM's 39.41%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
-266.00%
Negative EPS growth while AEM is at 39.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-266.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AEM is at 39.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4117.61%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
4117.61%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
48.45%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
48.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 70.13%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-24.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM stands at 82.63%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.15%
AR growth of 3.15% while AEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
7.29%
Inventory growth well above AEM's 13.40%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.98%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.39%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
15.09%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.23%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.37%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AEM's 52.69%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.