95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.36%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 29.05%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
9.63%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AEM's 63.61%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
17.56%
EBIT growth below 50% of AEM's 113.17%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
17.56%
Operating income growth under 50% of AEM's 113.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
9.89%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 468.55%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-5.00%
Negative EPS growth while AEM is at 450.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AEM is at 450.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
10.37%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 22.49%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
20.16%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 24.69%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.69%
Negative OCF growth while AEM is at 120.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.69%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 83.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
24.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 52.38%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25016083.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 36.98%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-0.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM stands at 93.67%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6533.86%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 22.06%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
505.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 585.74%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133689.28%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 94.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
637.84%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of AEM's 1030.68%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
432.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 29.95%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
513.55%
AR growth well above AEM's 2.35%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.07%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 27.30%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
38.01%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 4.64%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.86%
SG&A growth well above AEM's 20.70%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.