PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-82.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-95.52%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-95.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-362.24%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 55.82%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-300.00%
Negative EPS growth while AEM is at 40.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-325.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AEM is at 40.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
16.15%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 7.89%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.54%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 8.43%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.52%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1.52%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
80.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 155.60%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
-0.77%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
44.83%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25090.08%
Positive OCF/share growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
89.40%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-966.69%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AEM is 399.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-585.45%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM is 27.91%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1055.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 242.21%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
129.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 162.85%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.08%
AR growth well above AEM's 67.02%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.32%
Similar asset growth to AEM's 4.87%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-9.40%
We have a declining book value while AEM shows 7.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.91%
We have some new debt while AEM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.39%
We expand SG&A while AEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.