PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
68.51%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AEM's 7.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
62.95%
Positive gross profit growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
82.56%
Positive EBIT growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
82.56%
Positive operating income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
82.05%
Positive net income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
57.14%
Positive EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
83.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
5.19%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 0.23%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 0.73%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.55%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-769.02%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
201.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 873.55%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 5.75%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.53%
Positive OCF/share growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
12.86%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
261.32%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
4.77%
Positive short-term CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1398.92%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 621.01%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-82.05%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while AEM is at 225.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
87.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 69.65%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.67%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.25%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 7.89%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
19.91%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.50%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
88.69%
Debt growth far above AEM's 41.24%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
We cut SG&A while AEM invests at 10.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.