95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.55%
Revenue growth under 50% of AEM's 45.19%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
42.29%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of AEM's 49.39%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
31.40%
EBIT growth below 50% of AEM's 120.03%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
31.40%
Operating income growth under 50% of AEM's 120.03%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
19.33%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 349.40%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-73.33%
Negative EPS growth while AEM is at 357.14%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-69.23%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AEM is at 350.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.16%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 0.13%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.51%
Reduced diluted shares while AEM is at 0.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.30%
OCF growth under 50% of AEM's 116.90%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
17.36%
FCF growth under 50% of AEM's 217.03%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
78.28%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 952.58%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
140.24%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 253.17%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
48.10%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 136.37%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
252.65%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 364.79%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
55.50%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 72.58%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
285.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 331.06%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
50.62%
Below 50% of AEM's 126.34%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
440.98%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 226.59%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
60.50%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 38.17%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.50%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
Similar asset growth to AEM's 4.29%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
3.83%
75-90% of AEM's 5.01%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-75.82%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.97%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.