PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.75%
Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.32%
Positive gross profit growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.60%
Positive EBIT growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.60%
Positive operating income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-0.65%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
94.44%
Positive EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
88.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.02%
OCF growth under 50% of AEM's 88.84%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
12.57%
FCF growth under 50% of AEM's 525.74%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
118459836.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 560.84%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
221.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 185.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
104.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 182.95%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
6300.31%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 7297.33%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
379.59%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 445.40%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
143.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 169.83%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
122932.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 6065.63% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
363.33%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
176.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 32.95%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
215.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 165.49%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
86.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 49.46%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.31%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.63%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.42%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.84%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 2.07%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.66%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.35%
We cut SG&A while AEM invests at 54.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.