PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.12%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AEM's 5.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
25.66%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AEM's 3.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
24.79%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 20.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
24.79%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 20.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
21.19%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 52.05%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
20.00%
EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 51.85%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
23.53%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 53.85%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.10%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 0.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while AEM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.07%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
32.30%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
35.01%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
145787334.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 495.14%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
152.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 125.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
148.31%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 318.84%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
47649.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 7966.29%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
215.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 129.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
197.01%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 49.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
55639.64%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 2537.22% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
261.20%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 25.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
302.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of AEM's 601.09%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
153.14%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 122.37%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
92.18%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 52.24%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.48%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.82%
Asset growth at 75-90% of AEM's 2.14%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
2.14%
Similar to AEM's 2.18%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-7.14%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.32%
We expand SG&A while AEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.