Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Reduced diluted shares while AEM is at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 202.29%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 393.96%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 90.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 420.08% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 514.60%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 40.73%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 11.85%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Asset growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 1.38%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.

BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.59%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.

We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.