95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
78.11%
Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
56.56%
Positive gross profit growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
56.27%
Positive EBIT growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
56.27%
Positive operating income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
48.49%
Positive net income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
47.06%
Positive EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
47.06%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.14%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.29%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 1.07%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-30.00%
Dividend reduction while AEM stands at 4.48%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
97.45%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
149.53%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
747.55%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 610.66%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
260.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 225.82%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
206.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 73.83%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
10355.24%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 1391.06%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
365.07%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 103.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
245.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 79.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
9636.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 4842.21% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
349.98%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 5.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
237.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 57.45%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
3155.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 317.80%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
150.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 38.19%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
74.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 13.01%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.01%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.69%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.71%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.28%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.30%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-12.48%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 3.78%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.61%
We expand SG&A while AEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.