PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-28.37%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-23.08%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.72%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-19.72%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-24.94%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-24.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-26.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while AEM stands at 1.64%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-34.81%
Negative OCF growth while AEM is at 37.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-787.15%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 133.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
565.78%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AEM's 564.38%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
164.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AEM's 182.95%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
131.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 59.79%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
89499.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 11499.41%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
215.34%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 125.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
177.71%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 78.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
7607.09%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 285.91% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
200.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
188.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3166.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 324.97%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
149.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 35.60%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
75.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 12.29%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 4.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.97%
Positive asset growth while AEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.82%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 1.30%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
2077.39%
We have some new debt while AEM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.73%
SG&A growth well above AEM's 34.60%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.