PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.89%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-39.72%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-39.72%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-39.72%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-46.70%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-47.37%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-45.95%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.11%
Slight or no buybacks while AEM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.16%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.37%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
100.02%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
300.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 417.51%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
111.87%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 224.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
69.77%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1505.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with AEM's 1418.54%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
120.11%
Positive OCF/share growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
80.71%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1009.06%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
92.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
29.05%
Positive short-term CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2727.43%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 325.94%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
151.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 35.80%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
68.17%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 7.43%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.55%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.10%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.37%
We have a declining book value while AEM shows 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
4.84%
Debt growth far above AEM's 6.11%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.62%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.