PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.29%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 32.07%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.43%
Negative gross profit growth while AEM is at 238.90%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.43%
Negative EBIT growth while AEM is at 6185.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.43%
Negative operating income growth while AEM is at 6185.03%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
8.35%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 294.06%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 292.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 292.86%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.26%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 2.31%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.51%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-61.46%
Dividend reduction while AEM stands at 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-5.26%
Negative OCF growth while AEM is at 7.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
29250.87%
FCF growth above 1.5x AEM's 36.46%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
369.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 758.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
194.35%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 293.85%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
73.48%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 7.87%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1883.30%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 5111.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
271.01%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to AEM's 275.74%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
62.94%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1508.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 295.22% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
165.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to AEM's 180.03%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
7.72%
Positive short-term CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3689.21%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 327.82%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
157.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 32.86%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
62.48%
Positive short-term equity growth while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.62%
AR growth well above AEM's 6.95%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Asset growth well under 50% of AEM's 3.60%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.94%
Positive BV/share change while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-9.00%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 11.61%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.