PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.16%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-18.53%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-18.53%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.53%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-20.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-18.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 6.75%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 6.77%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.70%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
1085.59%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 165.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-24.65%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
2800.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 522.78%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
222.96%
Below 50% of AEM's 529.01%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-39.82%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM stands at 10.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
1699.31%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 102.87% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
186.89%
Below 50% of AEM's 2476.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-57.64%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
5331.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 260.41%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
123.30%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 34.95%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
41.24%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 2.03%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.42%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while AEM cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
57.80%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.00%
Asset growth well under 50% of AEM's 34.30%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.92%
Under 50% of AEM's 29.40%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.02%
Debt shrinking faster vs. AEM's 42.98%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.79%
We expand SG&A while AEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.