PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.03%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
5.03%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AEM's 30.96%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
5.03%
EBIT growth below 50% of AEM's 24.54%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.03%
Operating income growth under 50% of AEM's 24.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-5.02%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 235.05%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-7.14%
Negative EPS growth while AEM is at 230.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-7.14%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AEM is at 230.26%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while AEM stands at 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-5.30%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-962.45%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 97.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
265.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 211.03%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
40.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 47.58%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
-37.68%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
679.42%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 104.89%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
42.85%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to AEM's 40.64%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
-48.13%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
329.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 10.42% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-67.99%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1148.91%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 240.81%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 6.73%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
52.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 0.38%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.08%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 2.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.35%
Positive asset growth while AEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
22.01%
Positive BV/share change while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-19.88%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.79%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.