PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.48%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 1.57%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.49%
Negative gross profit growth while AEM is at 5.15%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-22.71%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-22.71%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
124.21%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 278.85%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
123.81%
EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 282.07%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
123.81%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 282.07%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-14.72%
Negative OCF growth while AEM is at 3.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
114.79%
FCF growth under 50% of AEM's 477.87%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
233.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 161.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
3.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-19.84%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
275.60%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with AEM's 257.11%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
-21.68%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-39.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
36.10%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-70.63%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-72.98%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
379.39%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 132.08%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
52.05%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.33%
Positive short-term equity growth while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.29%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.23%
Negative asset growth while AEM invests at 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.14%
Under 50% of AEM's 1.73%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.62%
SG&A growth well above AEM's 10.30%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.