PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.25%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 9.60%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
29.46%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 26.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
37.40%
EBIT growth similar to AEM's 38.83%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
37.40%
Operating income growth similar to AEM's 38.83%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
47.16%
Positive net income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
40.00%
Positive EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
40.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
8.38%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 1.13%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.40%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 1.47%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.03%
OCF growth under 50% of AEM's 57.48%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
16.51%
FCF growth under 50% of AEM's 135.93%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
122.35%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AEM's 112.47%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
-11.80%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
3.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 21.70%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
103.41%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 145.74%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-35.46%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is at 7.22%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-12.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM stands at 132.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
19.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-67.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-31.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM is 159.32%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
304.82%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 93.60%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
59.92%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
22.20%
Positive short-term equity growth while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
180.39%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while AEM is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-67.63%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
156.53%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Negative asset growth while AEM invests at 4.58%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
7.42%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 1.77%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-48.50%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 11.17%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.