PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.82%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AEM's 13.62%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
27.82%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of AEM's 34.88%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
33.04%
EBIT growth below 50% of AEM's 87.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
33.04%
Operating income growth under 50% of AEM's 87.45%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
37.61%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 160.09%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
35.71%
EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 144.44%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
35.71%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 175.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.90%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 0.96%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 1.10%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-47.91%
Dividend reduction while AEM stands at 34.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
20.34%
OCF growth at 75-90% of AEM's 23.27%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
-582.88%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 48.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
179.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 201.34%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
0.97%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
13.13%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 6.10%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
185.85%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 105.30%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-22.53%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is at 8.02%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
9.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 169.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
84.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-50.72%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AEM is 145.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-13.06%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
302.23%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 96.01%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
57.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
20.67%
Positive short-term equity growth while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.03%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while AEM is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-56.25%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-15.57%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 45.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.75%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 2.12%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.65%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.84%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
90.51%
We have some new debt while AEM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.58%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.