PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.60%
Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.05%
Positive gross profit growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.39%
Positive EBIT growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.39%
Positive operating income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
367.01%
Positive net income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
380.00%
Positive EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
380.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.10%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 0.15%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 0.16%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.87%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-483.01%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
115.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 290.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
1.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 20.16%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 0.90%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
90.20%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-13.59%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is at 15.89%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
12.80%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
590.04%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
258.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 114.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
439.98%
Positive short-term CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
227.59%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 42.44%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
30.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 4.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
6.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 9.71%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.93%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
71.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 24.57%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
453.10%
AR growth well above AEM's 223.13%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.26%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 5.11%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.16%
Positive BV/share change while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
44.27%
Debt growth far above AEM's 25.29%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
We expand SG&A while AEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.