PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.48%
Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
34.24%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AEM's 9.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
61.16%
EBIT growth below 50% of AEM's 273.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
61.16%
Operating income growth under 50% of AEM's 273.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
739.91%
Net income growth above 1.5x AEM's 109.41%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
766.67%
EPS growth above 1.5x AEM's 109.47%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
766.67%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AEM's 109.52%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while AEM stands at 21.82%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
8.97%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 5.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
9.36%
FCF growth under 50% of AEM's 72.93%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
264.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 218.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
9.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
8.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 1.61%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
210.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 101.48%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-17.22%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-5.79%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
130.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-42.21%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
26.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to AEM's 24.81%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
180.93%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 15.38%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
22.48%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 9.07%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
14.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 0.52%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.61%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 1127.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of AEM's 0.77%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.04%
Positive BV/share change while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.01%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 4.80%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.36%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.