PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.68%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.85%
Positive gross profit growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-6.90%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.90%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
11.50%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 588.30%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.29%
EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 588.89%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 578.84%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.19%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.65%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.26%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 1.06%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-14.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
99.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 4.33%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
35.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
22.28%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
73.19%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
25.11%
Positive OCF/share growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
19.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
51.85%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
77.41%
Below 50% of AEM's 832.86%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
54.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of AEM's 83.64%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
123.94%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 15.51%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
9.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 12.45%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
6.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 3.32%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.08%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 154.35%. Bill Ackman wants more robust earnings or a higher payout ratio to match the competitor.
56.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 109.40%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
94433.33%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
Positive asset growth while AEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.22%
Similar to AEM's 3.22%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-10.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
We expand SG&A while AEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.