PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.41%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 19.26%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-9.76%
Negative gross profit growth while AEM is at 56.84%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.19%
Negative EBIT growth while AEM is at 91.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.19%
Negative operating income growth while AEM is at 91.75%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-5.33%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 143.87%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-5.71%
Negative EPS growth while AEM is at 106.45%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-5.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AEM is at 106.45%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.14%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 18.35%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 18.47%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
Negative OCF growth while AEM is at 24.80%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
15.97%
FCF growth above 1.5x AEM's 4.85%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
17.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 29.20%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
48.43%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AEM's 45.76%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
57.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AEM's 55.33%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
-6.51%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM stands at 22.54%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
61.94%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 74.52%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
86.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 159.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-17.41%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AEM is at 152.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
115.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 168.25%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
218.03%
Below 50% of AEM's 440.98%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
76.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 86.65%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
24.80%
Below 50% of AEM's 70.05%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
23.93%
Below 50% of AEM's 81.21%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
44.13%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 85.78%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
119.91%
Below 50% of AEM's 304.60%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
82.04%
Below 50% of AEM's 226.14%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-46.31%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
61.49%
We show growth while AEM is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-0.33%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.92%
Positive BV/share change while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-9.45%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.46%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.