PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
44.37%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AEM's 9.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
43.20%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AEM's 18.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
47.82%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 39.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
47.82%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 39.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
44.74%
Positive net income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
52.00%
Positive EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
52.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.24%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.02%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
3.51%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while AEM cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
45.21%
Similar OCF growth to AEM's 48.41%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
-388.43%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 333.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
51.80%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 44.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
60.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AEM's 57.87%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
11.68%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
57.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 91.67%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
124.71%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 149.84%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
18.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
41.52%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 69.80%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
2319.88%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 53.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
6.30%
Positive short-term CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
62.87%
Below 50% of AEM's 126.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
31.82%
Below 50% of AEM's 99.76%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
20.68%
Below 50% of AEM's 66.12%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
68.43%
Similar 10Y dividend/share CAGR to AEM's 74.67%. Walter Schloss expects both to share consistent earnings expansions and payout practices.
95.52%
Below 50% of AEM's 261.08%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
45.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 8.69%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-1.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-43.80%
Inventory is declining while AEM stands at 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.74%
Positive asset growth while AEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.55%
Positive BV/share change while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.75%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.62%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AEM's 95.34%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.