95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.27%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 0.91%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.18%
Negative gross profit growth while AEM is at 14.08%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-4.08%
Negative EBIT growth while AEM is at 19.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.08%
Negative operating income growth while AEM is at 19.50%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-2.61%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 188.67%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-5.26%
Negative EPS growth while AEM is at 187.34%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-5.26%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AEM is at 187.34%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.23%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.46%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-11.81%
Negative OCF growth while AEM is at 4.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-9.47%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 26.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
40.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 29.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
28.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 61.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-9.56%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
50.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 10.03%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
81.81%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 147.18%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
-6.37%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM stands at 6.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
62.13%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 24.95% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
180.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 341.94%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
0.46%
Below 50% of AEM's 16.73%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
62.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 120.89%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
32.72%
Below 50% of AEM's 102.53%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
20.48%
Below 50% of AEM's 68.42%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.46%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.54%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.82%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.74%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 1.32%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-4.23%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.25%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.