95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.19%
Revenue growth under 50% of AEM's 13.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AEM's 37.15%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
6.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of AEM's 40.82%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.22%
Operating income growth under 50% of AEM's 40.82%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-25.44%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 35.95%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while AEM is at 37.68%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AEM is at 36.23%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.37%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.33%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
OCF growth under 50% of AEM's 23.13%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
176.60%
FCF growth above 1.5x AEM's 41.80%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
58.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 76.35%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
55.15%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 85.95%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-10.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM stands at 4.68%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
79.88%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with AEM's 80.57%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
110.42%
Below 50% of AEM's 258.51%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
7.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 14.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
51.96%
Below 50% of AEM's 365.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
196.44%
Below 50% of AEM's 701.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-26.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM is 17.10%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
61.34%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 73.30%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
37.69%
Below 50% of AEM's 102.98%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
19.58%
Below 50% of AEM's 66.11%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
144.99%
Below 50% of AEM's 371.88%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
115.34%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 225.90%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
33.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 19.34%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
80.90%
AR growth well above AEM's 5.25%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-8195400.00%
Inventory is declining while AEM stands at 0.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.97%
Asset growth at 50-75% of AEM's 1.79%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
1.18%
75-90% of AEM's 1.52%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-3.35%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.05%
SG&A growth well above AEM's 1.89%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.