PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.62%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AEM's 11.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
0.89%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AEM's 17.92%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
136.68%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AEM's 58.11%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
147.14%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AEM's 27.29%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
188.14%
Net income growth above 1.5x AEM's 59.98%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
194.74%
EPS growth above 1.5x AEM's 58.82%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AEM's 60.40%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.50%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while AEM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 124.61%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
82.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AEM's 75.21%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
52.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 42.57%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.09%
Below 50% of AEM's 1147.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
164.17%
Below 50% of AEM's 1901.83%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
60.31%
Below 50% of AEM's 423.92%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.42%
We expand SG&A while AEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.