PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.97%
Revenue growth under 50% of AEM's 15.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
10.64%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AEM's 26.52%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
13.90%
EBIT growth below 50% of AEM's 37.31%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
13.42%
Operating income growth under 50% of AEM's 32.37%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
15.07%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 33.33%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.29%
EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 33.33%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 32.72%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.04%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.11%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.47%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
OCF growth under 50% of AEM's 81.04%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-74.72%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 126.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
172.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 140.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
100.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 146.53%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
65.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AEM's 64.01%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
238.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 330.23%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
170.21%
Below 50% of AEM's 457.75%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
100.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 170.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
384.37%
Below 50% of AEM's 4518.09%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
173.02%
Below 50% of AEM's 395.04%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
95.04%
Below 50% of AEM's 238.89%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
53.97%
Below 50% of AEM's 132.80%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
40.97%
Below 50% of AEM's 107.03%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
19.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 25.79%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
282.43%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 446.25%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
76.17%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 114.76%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
25.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 11.15%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
147.04%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Asset growth at 75-90% of AEM's 3.82%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
3.43%
75-90% of AEM's 4.28%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
1.99%
We have some new debt while AEM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.