PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.05%
Negative revenue growth while FNV stands at 2.23%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.05%
Negative gross profit growth while FNV is at 6.01%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-31.12%
Negative EBIT growth while FNV is at 19.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-31.12%
Negative operating income growth while FNV is at 8.68%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-25.48%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 20.08%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
171.04%
EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 17.43%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
171.04%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 17.43%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-185.05%
Negative OCF growth while FNV is at 48.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-185.05%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
35.12%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 177.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 85.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
15.00%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 6.49%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-224.40%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV stands at 65.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.74%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FNV stands at 60.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-29.74%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FNV is at 27.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-31.50%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FNV is at 5.06%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.53%
Our AR growth while FNV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
17.35%
We show growth while FNV is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-13.66%
Negative asset growth while FNV invests at 5.52%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-23.19%
We have a declining book value while FNV shows 4.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-163.74%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.