95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.65%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FNV's 2.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
38.65%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FNV's 6.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
73.73%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FNV's 19.38%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
73.73%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FNV's 8.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
58.05%
Net income growth above 1.5x FNV's 20.08%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
63.85%
EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 17.43%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
63.85%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 17.43%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.32%
OCF growth above 1.5x FNV's 48.94%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
98.32%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
82.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 177.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
82.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to FNV's 85.48%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
36511827.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 6.49%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.28%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV stands at 65.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74837.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 27.75%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.79%
Our AR growth while FNV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
25.00%
We show growth while FNV is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
13.95%
Asset growth above 1.5x FNV's 5.52%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
15.43%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FNV's 4.86%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.33%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.27%
We expand SG&A while FNV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.