PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.36%
Negative revenue growth while FNV stands at 2.23%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
9.63%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FNV's 6.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
17.56%
EBIT growth similar to FNV's 19.38%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
17.56%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FNV's 8.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
9.89%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 20.08%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-5.00%
Negative EPS growth while FNV is at 17.43%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FNV is at 17.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
10.37%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
20.16%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.69%
Negative OCF growth while FNV is at 48.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.69%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
24.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 177.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25016083.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 85.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-0.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FNV stands at 6.49%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6533.86%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 181.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
505.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 65.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133689.28%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 156.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
637.84%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 27.75%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
432.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 5.06%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
513.55%
Our AR growth while FNV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.07%
Asset growth above 1.5x FNV's 5.52%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
38.01%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FNV's 4.86%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.86%
We expand SG&A while FNV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.