95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
84.41%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FNV's 2.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
113.04%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FNV's 6.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
101.43%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FNV's 19.38%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
101.43%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FNV's 8.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
82.56%
Net income growth above 1.5x FNV's 20.08%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
71.43%
EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 17.43%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
57.14%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 17.43%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
17.56%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
16.72%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
136.40%
OCF growth above 1.5x FNV's 48.94%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
114.16%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
176.53%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to FNV's 177.64%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
57829388.07%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 85.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
86.27%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 6.49%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15049.50%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 181.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
587.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 65.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15476.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 156.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
542.05%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 27.75%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
753.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 5.06%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.85%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
6.26%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 5.52%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
27.21%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FNV's 4.86%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-88.89%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
226.59%
We expand SG&A while FNV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.