95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.51%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FNV's 2.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
6.54%
Gross profit growth similar to FNV's 6.01%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
118.24%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FNV's 19.38%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
118.24%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FNV's 8.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
5.52%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 20.08%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth at 50-75% of FNV's 17.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of FNV's 17.43%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.25%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.72%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.55%
OCF growth under 50% of FNV's 48.94%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
5.55%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
160.64%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to FNV's 177.64%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
144.72%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 85.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
42.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 6.49%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2634.32%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 181.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
43040.45%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 65.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3534.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 156.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
405.46%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 27.75%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
766.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 27.88%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
921.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 5.06%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.74%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.88%
Asset growth at 50-75% of FNV's 5.52%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
3.73%
75-90% of FNV's 4.86%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.28%
We expand SG&A while FNV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.