95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.85%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FNV's 2.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
32.57%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FNV's 6.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
31.93%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FNV's 19.38%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
31.93%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FNV's 8.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
29.71%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 20.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
22.22%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 17.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 17.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.39%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.49%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.93%
OCF growth at 50-75% of FNV's 48.94%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
26.93%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
196.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 177.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
135.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 85.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
137.47%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 6.49%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2148.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 181.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
271.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 65.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2063.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 156.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
193.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 27.75%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1201.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 27.88%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
144.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 5.06%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.70%
Our AR growth while FNV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.67%
Asset growth well under 50% of FNV's 5.52%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.54%
50-75% of FNV's 4.86%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-3.49%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.77%
We expand SG&A while FNV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.