PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.55%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-29.83%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.91%
Negative EBIT growth while FNV is at 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-19.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-18.31%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while FNV is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FNV is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
4.01%
Share change of 4.01% while FNV is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-0.11%
Reduced diluted shares while FNV is at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.69%
Negative OCF growth while FNV is at 24.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-41.69%
Negative FCF growth while FNV is at 28.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
115.32%
10Y CAGR of 115.32% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
59.36%
5Y CAGR of 59.36% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
46.89%
3Y CAGR of 46.89% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
580.66%
OCF/share CAGR of 580.66% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
89.09%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 89.09% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
506.67%
Net income/share CAGR of 506.67% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
114.08%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 114.08% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
934.37%
Equity/share CAGR of 934.37% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
1372.10%
Equity/share CAGR of 1372.10% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
249.39%
Equity/share CAGR of 249.39% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.67%
Firm’s AR is declining while FNV shows 6.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.63%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.58%
Positive BV/share change while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-27.61%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.