PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.31%
Positive revenue growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
428.44%
Positive gross profit growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1191.12%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FNV's 43.13%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1191.12%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FNV's 325.97%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
130.31%
Positive net income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
133.33%
Positive EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
133.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.83%
Positive OCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-7.04%
Negative FCF growth while FNV is at 22.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
80.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 9.31%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
201.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 9.31%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-0.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FNV stands at 9.31%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1448.55%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 93.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
13.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 93.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-25.18%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2112.95%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
94.55%
Positive short-term equity growth while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.40%
Our AR growth while FNV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.66%
Positive asset growth while FNV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
27.41%
Positive BV/share change while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-58.40%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.83%
We expand SG&A while FNV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.