PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.79%
Revenue growth under 50% of FNV's 95.77%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
45.14%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FNV's 98.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
50.25%
EBIT growth below 50% of FNV's 133.01%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
50.25%
Operating income growth under 50% of FNV's 231.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
51.37%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 221.23%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
36.36%
EPS growth under 50% of FNV's 218.18%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FNV's 218.18%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
9.22%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.17%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.14%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 1.35%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.41%
Positive OCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
140.85%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
235.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 69.12%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
179.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 69.12%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
33.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 69.12%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
399.61%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 4.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
53.51%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 4.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
290.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 130.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
37.95%
Below 50% of FNV's 130.30%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
251.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 20.26%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
73.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 20.26%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while FNV shows 26.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Negative asset growth while FNV invests at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.17%
We have a declining book value while FNV shows 3.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-52.05%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
SG&A growth well above FNV's 4.39%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.