95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.09%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.91%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.34%
Positive EBIT growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.34%
Positive operating income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-12.16%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.85%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-17.03%
Negative FCF growth while FNV is at 359.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
213.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 10.47%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
160.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 10.47%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
25.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 10.47%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
445.64%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 182.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
24.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 182.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 20.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
15.46%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of FNV's 20.28%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
443.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 5.74%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
64.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 5.74%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.90%
Our AR growth while FNV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.18%
Asset growth well under 50% of FNV's 4.77%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.12%
Similar to FNV's 3.01%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
270.10%
Debt growth of 270.10% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.61%
SG&A growth well above FNV's 4.99%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.