PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.91%
Negative revenue growth while FNV stands at 6.52%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.35%
Negative gross profit growth while FNV is at 10.56%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-3.96%
Negative EBIT growth while FNV is at 40.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-3.96%
Negative operating income growth while FNV is at 26.96%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-8.80%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 32.35%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-9.52%
Negative EPS growth while FNV is at 29.63%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-9.52%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FNV is at 30.77%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 4.52%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 1.66%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.02%
Dividend growth under 50% of FNV's 48.25%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-0.62%
Negative OCF growth while FNV is at 79.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-82.43%
Negative FCF growth while FNV is at 8.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
56.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 123.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
176.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 123.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
229.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 123.33%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
12196.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 92.46%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
268.99%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 92.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
426.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 92.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
10696.01%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 251.68% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
273.92%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to FNV's 251.68%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
367.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 251.68%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
2022.77%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 29.75%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
155.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 29.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
97.53%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 29.75%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.73%
Our AR growth while FNV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Negative asset growth while FNV invests at 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.38%
Positive BV/share change while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.69%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
We expand SG&A while FNV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.