PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.60%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of FNV's 4.60%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
-0.21%
Negative gross profit growth while FNV is at 4.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.18%
Positive EBIT growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.18%
Positive operating income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
7.19%
Positive net income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7.89%
Positive EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.06%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 3.38%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.02%
Reduced diluted shares while FNV is at 1.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
199.89%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while FNV cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-2.13%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
453.95%
FCF growth above 1.5x FNV's 54.42%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
571.98%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 112.64%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
174.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 112.64%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
295.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 112.64%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
9273.18%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 85.47%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
242.80%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 85.47%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
489.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 85.47%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
13730.08%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
280.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
321.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2138.64%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 50.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
158.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 50.74%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
128.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 50.74%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.87%
Firm’s AR is declining while FNV shows 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.04%
Asset growth well under 50% of FNV's 13.32%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.81%
Under 50% of FNV's 10.16%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-8.33%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.24%
We cut SG&A while FNV invests at 27.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.